10 Meetups About Evolution Korea You Should Attend
Wiki Article
Evolution Korea
The economic crisis that swept across Asia led to a major rethinking of the traditional system of government, business alliances, as well as public management of risk. In Korea, this meant a shift in the development paradigm.
In a controversial move, South Korea's government has requested textbook publishers not to comply with calls to eliminate examples of evolution from science textbooks for high school students. This includes the evidence for the evolution of horses as well as the avian ancestor Archaeopteryx.
1. Evolution and Religion
A group of creationists in South Korea has successfully convinced textbook publishers to omit evidence of evolution from science textbooks for high school students. The move was a result of a campaign led by the Society for Textbook Revise (STR) which is an offshoot of the Korea Association for Creation Research which aims to get rid of textbooks on biology of "atheist materialism." The STR claims that this kind of materialistic views create a negative image for students and leads to their eventual denial of faith.
Scientists from all over the world expressed concern when the STR campaign was featured in the news. Jae Choe, an evolutionary biologist at Ewha Womans University, Seoul and wrote an open letter to Nature's editor that South Korea had succumbed to religious prejudice. He was supported by colleagues across the country, who set up a group called Evolution Korea to organize a petition against the changes to the textbooks.
Some scientists are concerned about the possibility that the STR campaign will be spread to other parts of the world where the belief in creationism is on the rise. The letter to Nature warned that the anti-evolution movement could intensify pressure for revisions to textbooks in other countries, particularly those with large Christian and Muslim population.
South Korea's cultural background is especially strong in the debate over evolution. 26 percent of the nation's citizens belong to an organized religion, and most practice Christianity or Buddhism. Many Koreans also follow Ch'ondogyo, a philosophy based upon Confucian principles that is a strong advocate of social harmony, individual self-cultivation and self-respect. Ch'ondogyo is a belief system that teaches that humans are in a relationship with Hanulnim, the God of the Sun, and that heavenly blessings can be derived through the good deeds of a person.
All of this has created a fertile ground. Numerous studies have revealed that students with religious backgrounds to be more reluctant to learn about evolution as compared to those who do not. The reasons behind this aren't obvious. Students who are religious may not be as familiar with the theories of science, making them more susceptible to the creationists influence. Another possible factor is that students with religious backgrounds are more likely to see evolution as an atheistic idea which could make them less comfortable with the idea.
2. Evolution and Science
In recent years, anti-evolution campaigns in schools have raised concerns among the scientific community. A 2009 survey revealed that more than 40% of Americans believe that biological evolution is wrong and that a belief in it would be contrary to their religious beliefs. Despite the fact that creationism has been a huge success in some states, a lot of scientists believe that the best way to combat this inclination is not to be actively involved in it, but to educate the public about the evidence that supports evolution.
Scientists have a duty to educate their students about science and the theory of evolution. They also need to inform the public about the process of scientific research and the way in which knowledge is verified. They must also explain how scientific theories are frequently challenged and modified. However, misinformation about the nature and purpose of research can fuel anti-evolution views.
For instance, some people are able to confuse the term "theory" with the common meaning of the word - a hunch or a guess. In science, however the theory is thoroughly tested and verified using empirical data. A theory that is repeatedly tested and observed is then a scientific principle.
The debate about evolutionary theory is a good opportunity to discuss the importance of the scientific method and its limitations. It is crucial for people to understand that science cannot answer questions about the purpose or meaning of life but only provides a mechanism by which living things can grow and change.
A well-rounded education should also include exposure to all major scientific fields including evolutionary biology. This is crucial because a lot of jobs and decisions require that people understand the way science works.
The majority of scientists around the world believe that humans have changed over time. In a recent study that predicted adults' views of the consensus on this subject people with higher levels of education and science knowledge were found to be more likely to believe that there is wide agreement among scientists regarding human evolution. People with more religious beliefs and less science-based knowledge are more likely to disapprove. It is crucial that educators insist on the importance of understanding this consensus so that people can make informed choices about health care, energy usage, and other policy matters.
3. Evolution and Culture
A close relative to mainstream evolutionary theory, cultural evolution explores the many ways that organisms, including humans, learn from and with each other. Researchers in this field employ elaborate models and tools that are adapted from the ones used by evolutionary theorists, and they go back to human prehistory to discover the genesis of our capacity to learn about culture.
This approach also recognizes the distinction between traits that are cultural and biological. Cultural traits can be acquired gradually while biological traits are mostly inherited at the same time (in sexual species, at fertilization). As a result, the acquisition of one cultural characteristic can affect the development of another.
In Korea, for example the introduction of Western fashion elements in the late 19th and early 20th century was a result of a variety of events. One of the most important was the arrival of Japanese occupation forces, who introduced Western hairstyles and styles of clothing to Korean society.
After that, when Japan left Korea in the 1930s, some of those trends began to reverse. By the end of World War II, Korea was once more united, this time under the rule of the Choson dynasty.
Today, Korea is an economic and political power. Despite the financial crisis of recent, Korea's economy has been growing at a steady pace over the past decade. It is expected to continue this growth in the coming years.
However, the current government faces numerous challenges. One of the most serious is the inability to come up with a consistent policy to deal with the economic crisis. The crisis has exposed weaknesses of the country's policies and its reliance on foreign investment and exports that may not last.
The financial crisis has shaken the confidence of investors. This means that the government has to reconsider its approach and find other ways to increase domestic demand. It will also have to reform the incentive monitoring, control, and discipline systems that are in place to guarantee a stable financial environment. This chapter provides a number of scenarios on how the Korean economy might develop in a post-crisis world.
4. Evolution and Education
The biggest challenge for educators of evolution is how to present evolutionary concepts in a manner that is appropriate for students of different levels of development and ages. Teachers, for instance, must be sensitive to the religious diversity in their classrooms and create a space where students with religious and secular views feel comfortable learning evolution. Teachers must also understand common misconceptions about evolution, and how to deal with these in their classrooms. Teachers must also have access to a variety of resources that are available for teaching evolution and be able locate them quickly.
In this regard, the Thinking Evolutionarily Convocation played a significant role in bringing together evolutionary researchers and educators from different sectors to discuss best methods of teaching about Evolution. Attendees included representatives of scientific societies and educational researchers, as well as officials of government funding agencies as well as curriculum developers. The convergence of these diverse stakeholders helped to identify a shared set of recommendations that will be the basis for future actions.
It is important to include evolution in all science curricula, at every level. To achieve this it is recommended that the National Science Education Standards (NRC) require that evolution be taught in an integrated manner across all sciences using a sequence of concepts that are developmental appropriate. Furthermore, a new publication from the NRC offers guidelines to schools on how to integrate evolution into their life science curriculum.
Numerous studies have shown that a more comprehensive teaching of evolution is linked to greater student knowledge and belief in evolution. However, estimating causal effects in the classroom is challenging due to the fact that school curriculums are not randomly assigned and change over time as a result of the predetermined timing of gubernatorial elections and state board of education appointments. To overcome this problem I employ a longitudinal dataset that allows me to control the fixed effects of state and years as well as individual-level variations in the beliefs of teachers regarding evolutionary theory.
Another significant finding is that teachers who feel more comfortable teaching evolution report having fewer intrapersonal barriers to doing so. This is in line with the hypothesis that more confident faculty are less likely to be hesitant about questions about evolution in the classroom. They may also be more 에볼루션 슬롯 likely to employ strategies such as a reconciliatory approach which is used to increase the acceptance of undergraduate students of evolution.